Current:Home > InvestMore gay and bisexual men will now be able to donate blood under finalized FDA rules -InvestSmart Insights
More gay and bisexual men will now be able to donate blood under finalized FDA rules
View
Date:2025-04-17 06:00:13
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said Thursday it had officially eliminated restrictions that had previously prohibited many blood donations by gay and bisexual men — a longstanding policy that critics say is discriminatory.
In a news release, the federal agency said it will recommend a series of "individual risk-based questions" that will be the same for every blood donor, regardless of their sexual orientation, gender or sex. Those who have had anal sex with a new sexual partner, or more than one sexual partner, within the last three months would be asked to wait to donate blood.
"The implementation of these recommendations will represent a significant milestone for the agency and the LGBTQI+ community," Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in the release.
With the updated guidelines, most gay and bisexual men who are in a monogamous relationship with a man will no longer have to refrain from sex in order to donate blood.
Previously, FDA guidelines for donating blood — which were last updated in 2020 — stated that men who have sex with men are allowed to donate blood after a three-month deferral period in which they refrain from having sex with another man.
While the number of people eligible to donate blood has expanded, the agency said it will continue to monitor the safety of the blood supply.
The 40-year-old restrictions were to protect the blood supply from HIV
Restrictions on donating blood date back to the early days of the AIDS epidemic and were designed to protect the blood supply from HIV.
At first, gay and bisexual men were completely prohibited from donating blood. But over time, the FDA ultimately relaxed the lifetime ban. However, the agency still kept some limits in place.
The newly updated guidelines are aimed at addressing years-long criticisms that the previous policy was discriminatory and outdated, and posed yet another barrier to bolstering the nation's blood supply.
Blood banks already routinely screen donated blood for HIV.
And for decades, organizations including the American Medical Association, the American Red Cross and numerous LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have called for a rule change.
The changes are a mostly welcome shift in a new direction, advocates say
Reaction to the news has been mostly positive from advocates, medical groups and blood banks.
"This shift toward individual donor assessments prioritizes the safety of America's blood supply while treating all donors with the fairness and respect they deserve," said Kate Fry, CEO of America's Blood Centers, a non-profit organization that brings together community-based and independent blood centers, in a statement.
Fry said that the FDA's final guidance is based on data that shows the best protection against diseases, like HIV, is through strong testing of all blood donation — and a uniform screening process for each donor.
President and CEO of GLAAD Sarah Kate Ellis echoed that approval in a statement, saying "The FDA's decision to follow science and issue new recommendations for all Americans, regardless of sexual orientation, who selflessly donate blood to help save lives, signals the beginning of the end of a dark and discriminatory past rooted in fear and homophobia,"
However, Ellis said while the new guidance is a step in the right direction, there is still a barrier for LGBTQ+ people who are on PrEP, an FDA-approved drug proven to prevent the transmission of HIV, who may want to donate blood.
"GLAAD urges the FDA to continue to prioritize science over stigma and treat all donors and all blood equally," she added.
NPR's Rob Stein and Will Stone contributed to this report.
veryGood! (99)
Related
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Experts raised safety concerns about OceanGate years before its Titanic sub vanished
- Inside Clean Energy: Some EVs Now Pay for Themselves in a Year
- Amid the Devastation of Hurricane Ian, a New Study Charts Alarming Flood Risks for U.S. Hospitals
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Inside Clean Energy: In a World Starved for Lithium, Researchers Develop a Method to Get It from Water
- What we know about the 5 men who were aboard the wrecked Titan sub
- The Second Biggest Disaster at Mount Vesuvius
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Some cancer drugs are in short supply, putting patients' care at risk. Here's why
Ranking
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Post-Tucker Carlson, Fox News hopes Jesse Watters will bring back viewers
- Inside Clean Energy: The US’s New Record in Renewables, Explained in Three Charts
- Study Finds Global Warming Fingerprint on 2022’s Northern Hemisphere Megadrought
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Cities Are a Big Part of the Climate Problem. They Can Also Be a Big Part of the Solution
- A New Shell Plant in Pennsylvania Will Soon Become the State’s Second Largest Emitter of Volatile Organic Chemicals
- Taking a breather: Fed holds interest rates steady in patient battle against inflation
Recommendation
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Nature vs. nurture - what twin studies mean for economics
Maria Menounos Proudly Shares Photo of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Scars
What we know about the 5 men who were aboard the wrecked Titan sub
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
Remember Reaganomics? Freakonomics? Now there's Bidenomics
Mission: Impossible's Hayley Atwell Slams “Invasive” Tom Cruise Romance Rumors
Jonah Hill's Ex Sarah Brady Accuses Actor of Emotional Abuse